Matchup history · 2025-26

Tyrese Maxey vs Payton Pritchard

Across 11 meetings and 95 matchup possessions, Maxey scored 11% below his own rate across the tracked data against Pritchard. He shot 46.2% from the field in the matchup against 45.1% overall. Treat it as a pattern worth checking on film rather than proof the defender caused it.

The numbers

Each figure sits next to Maxey's own rate against every defender he faced, which is the only fair comparison for this unit.

Points per matchup possession

0.32vs 0.35 season

11% below his season rate.

Field goal percentage

46.2%vs 45.1% season

+1.1 points of field goal percentage, on 26 shots in the matchup.

11
Meetings
95.1
Matchup poss.
30
Points
12/26
FG
2
Turnovers

Possessions here are partial matchup possessions, only the stretches these two were actually matched up, so points per possession runs far below the roughly 1.1 a full team scores. Every figure is meant to be read against the same player's own season rate in the same unit.

Recorded games: 2025-10-22 to 2026-05-02

This ledger covers 11 tracked meetings, starting with PHI at BOS on 2025-10-22 and ending with PHI at BOS on 2026-05-02. It includes only per-game assignments with at least two partial matchup possessions; meetings or brief assignments absent from the feed are not treated as zero.

Tyrese Maxey scoring while matched with Payton Pritchard — 2025–26
Date / NBA gameFinal score (away–home)CompetitionPartial poss.PointsFGTO
2025-10-220022500083PHI 117 – BOS 116Regular Season39.862/80
2025-10-310022500021BOS 109 – PHI 108Regular Season5.600/01
2025-11-110022500209BOS 100 – PHI 102Regular Season3.552/20
2026-03-010022500874PHI 98 – BOS 114Regular Season3.721/20
2026-04-190042500111PHI 91 – BOS 123Playoffs9.200/01
2026-04-210042500112PHI 111 – BOS 97Playoffs2.931/20
2026-04-240042500113BOS 108 – PHI 100Playoffs6.121/30
2026-04-260042500114BOS 128 – PHI 96Playoffs2.921/10
2026-04-280042500115PHI 113 – BOS 97Playoffs4.952/30
2026-04-300042500116BOS 93 – PHI 106Playoffs9.852/30
2026-05-020042500117PHI 109 – BOS 100Playoffs6.700/20
Total11 recorded meetings95.13012/262

Competition context

Regular Season: 4 meetings, 52.6 partial possessions, 13 points and 12 shots; 0.25 points per partial possession.

Playoffs: 7 meetings, 42.5 partial possessions, 17 points and 14 shots; 0.40 points per partial possession.

The pooled figure combines different competition settings. Compare the phase rates before using the overall number: repeated playoff assignments can dominate a season-long pairing.

Does one game drive the result?

The largest assignment was PHI at BOS on 2025-10-22: 39.8 partial possessions, 6 points and 2/8 shooting. It supplies 41.9% of this pairing’s recorded exposure and 30.8% of its shots.

Removing that game leaves 10 meetings and 55.3 partial possessions. The scoring rate changes from 0.32 to 0.43, against the same complete season baseline of 0.35.

The descriptive comparison changes from below baseline to above baseline. Start the film review with that largest game; the overall headline depends on which meetings you include. The 10% band is an editorial description, not a confidence interval or a prediction.

Baseline and film-review plan

Tyrese Maxey’s full 2025–26 tracked baseline contains 6,201.8 partial matchup possessions, 2196 points and 841/1864 field goals against all recorded defenders. It includes this pairing. The baseline uses the same two-possession per-game floor and combines the same competition types; it is not a team offensive rating.

The pairing accounts for 1.5% of that tracked exposure. Its shooting rate is 46.2% versus 45.1% in the baseline. Shooting and scoring move in different directions here. Review shot mix, free throws and the tracking denominator before treating either figure as a single explanation.

  1. Review the largest assignment above. Tag the first action, initial defender, help, shot location and result separately.
  2. Compare with the smallest recorded assignment: PHI at BOS on 2026-04-21, 2.9 partial possessions and 3 points. Check whether the same action appears before calling it a repeatable tendency.
  3. Write one coverage question to verify in another game. The tracking table cannot identify a scheme, isolate switches, or show unrecorded meetings.

Sources and publication checks

NBA player-matchup tracking, distributed in the SportsDataverse matchup release; dates, teams and final scores from its NBA calendar release. Individual game links identify the source event; they do not promise free video. HoopBrief calculates the totals, exposure shares and one-game removal above.

This report does not yet pass the publication gate: 6 recorded games, 150 partial possessions, 25 shots, complete dated game context, a usable complete scorer baseline, and exact reconciliation of game totals with the summary. Passing the gate makes a report auditable, not causal. These historical figures are not 2026–27 statistics. Open Matchup Lab and choose a season for current coverage.

How to read this

These are the possessions the two were matched up, not a clean isolation of one defender against one scorer. Help, coverage calls, foul trouble, rest, and shot luck all live inside the same numbers, and 11 meetings is a small sample for any of them.

So a gap here is a reason to pull the film on these possessions, not evidence that the defender caused it. The useful question is what the offense tried in this matchup and what it stopped trying.

Both scouting reports

Build your next scouting question

Use this historical record to choose what to verify next. The free Scout works with current player profiles; it does not upload your film or automatically reproduce the historical assignments above.

The free scout needs no account. Full reports in the app start at $9.99/mo.

Related matchups

Browse every published matchup

Aggregated from NBA player-matchup tracking for 2025-26, across all competition types. Possessions are partial matchup possessions and retain up to one decimal place here. Figures describe what happened while these two were matched up and do not isolate one player's effect on the other.

Start free