Matchup history · 2025-26

Paolo Banchero vs Cade Cunningham

Across 9 meetings and 111 matchup possessions, Banchero scored 35% above his own rate across the tracked data against Cunningham. He shot 40.5% from the field in the matchup against 45.7% overall. Treat it as a pattern worth checking on film rather than proof the defender caused it.

The numbers

Each figure sits next to Banchero's own rate against every defender he faced, which is the only fair comparison for this unit.

Points per matchup possession

0.43vs 0.32 season

35% above his season rate.

Field goal percentage

40.5%vs 45.7% season

-5.2 points of field goal percentage, on 42 shots in the matchup.

9
Meetings
110.6
Matchup poss.
48
Points
17/42
FG
10
Turnovers

Possessions here are partial matchup possessions, only the stretches these two were actually matched up, so points per possession runs far below the roughly 1.1 a full team scores. Every figure is meant to be read against the same player's own season rate in the same unit.

Recorded games: 2025-10-29 to 2026-05-03

This ledger covers 9 tracked meetings, starting with ORL at DET on 2025-10-29 and ending with ORL at DET on 2026-05-03. It includes only per-game assignments with at least two partial matchup possessions; meetings or brief assignments absent from the feed are not treated as zero.

Paolo Banchero scoring while matched with Cade Cunningham — 2025–26
Date / NBA gameFinal score (away–home)CompetitionPartial poss.PointsFGTO
2025-10-290022500129ORL 116 – DET 135Regular Season741/11
2026-03-010022500875DET 106 – ORL 92Regular Season19.642/24
2026-04-190042500101ORL 112 – DET 101Playoffs8.421/21
2026-04-220042500102ORL 83 – DET 98Playoffs10.842/41
2026-04-250042500103DET 105 – ORL 113Playoffs11.942/71
2026-04-270042500104DET 88 – ORL 94Playoffs15.161/70
2026-04-290042500105ORL 109 – DET 116Playoffs13.293/72
2026-05-010042500106DET 93 – ORL 79Playoffs13.761/60
2026-05-030042500107ORL 94 – DET 116Playoffs10.994/60
Total9 recorded meetings110.64817/4210

Competition context

Regular Season: 2 meetings, 26.6 partial possessions, 8 points and 3 shots; 0.30 points per partial possession.

Playoffs: 7 meetings, 84 partial possessions, 40 points and 39 shots; 0.48 points per partial possession.

The pooled figure combines different competition settings. Compare the phase rates before using the overall number: repeated playoff assignments can dominate a season-long pairing.

Does one game drive the result?

The largest assignment was DET at ORL on 2026-03-01: 19.6 partial possessions, 4 points and 2/2 shooting. It supplies 17.7% of this pairing’s recorded exposure and 4.8% of its shots.

Removing that game leaves 8 meetings and 91 partial possessions. The scoring rate changes from 0.43 to 0.48, against the same complete season baseline of 0.32.

Both versions remain above baseline. The direction survives this one-game removal, but that does not establish a defensive effect or statistical significance. The 10% band is an editorial description, not a confidence interval or a prediction.

Baseline and film-review plan

Paolo Banchero’s full 2025–26 tracked baseline contains 5,695.9 partial matchup possessions, 1834 points and 673/1474 field goals against all recorded defenders. It includes this pairing. The baseline uses the same two-possession per-game floor and combines the same competition types; it is not a team offensive rating.

The pairing accounts for 1.9% of that tracked exposure. Its shooting rate is 40.5% versus 45.7% in the baseline. Shooting and scoring move in different directions here. Review shot mix, free throws and the tracking denominator before treating either figure as a single explanation.

  1. Review the largest assignment above. Tag the first action, initial defender, help, shot location and result separately.
  2. Compare with the smallest recorded assignment: ORL at DET on 2025-10-29, 7 partial possessions and 4 points. Check whether the same action appears before calling it a repeatable tendency.
  3. Write one coverage question to verify in another game. The tracking table cannot identify a scheme, isolate switches, or show unrecorded meetings.

Sources and publication checks

NBA player-matchup tracking, distributed in the SportsDataverse matchup release; dates, teams and final scores from its NBA calendar release. Individual game links identify the source event; they do not promise free video. HoopBrief calculates the totals, exposure shares and one-game removal above.

This report does not yet pass the publication gate: 6 recorded games, 150 partial possessions, 25 shots, complete dated game context, a usable complete scorer baseline, and exact reconciliation of game totals with the summary. Passing the gate makes a report auditable, not causal. These historical figures are not 2026–27 statistics. Open Matchup Lab and choose a season for current coverage.

How to read this

These are the possessions the two were matched up, not a clean isolation of one defender against one scorer. Help, coverage calls, foul trouble, rest, and shot luck all live inside the same numbers, and 9 meetings is a small sample for any of them.

So a gap here is a reason to pull the film on these possessions, not evidence that the defender caused it. The useful question is what the offense tried in this matchup and what it stopped trying.

Both scouting reports

Build your next scouting question

Use this historical record to choose what to verify next. The free Scout works with current player profiles; it does not upload your film or automatically reproduce the historical assignments above.

The free scout needs no account. Full reports in the app start at $9.99/mo.

Related matchups

Browse every published matchup

Aggregated from NBA player-matchup tracking for 2025-26, across all competition types. Possessions are partial matchup possessions and retain up to one decimal place here. Figures describe what happened while these two were matched up and do not isolate one player's effect on the other.

Start free